ENGL 3371 - Film as Literature: Film as Literature (WM- Jan 06 to Jan 17)
Spring 2025 Syllabus, Section W01, CRN 27218
Instructor Information
Jude Galbraith
Email: jude.galbraith@tamiu.edu
Office: AIC 375
Office Hours:
MTWTF: 10:30am-12pm
Office Phone: 9563262473
Times and Location
Course Description
Additional Course Information
This course will explore philosophical questions through film. Films raise many philosophical issues – the medium itself is of great philosophical interest, and many individual films explore rich philosophical topics. The course will briefly introduce students to the analysis of film itself as an aesthetic object capable of conveying meaning. Film is an art form that makes the moving image its primary medium, and we must gain some familiarity with the elements of this art form to understand how films produce affect and emotion (and explore how particular films can succeed or fail in their production of such effects). Then, we will explore whether film can be a philosophical medium – whether it can convey, not just narrative, but argument. We will examine a neo-Platonic critique of film’s philosophical potential and explore possible general responses to that critique. Then, we will move to the discussion of some key problems in philosophy and in our current social moment: the essence of the mind, the best models of moral deliberation ethical action, the existential dilemmas of a life without overarching purpose, free will and determinism, the promise and peril of artificial intelligence and other issues. These problems will be explored through core philosophical texts and illustrated in films. Throughout the course, we will debate the strengths and weaknesses of the moving image as a means of conveying these philosophical ideas, and explore how film can be used, not just to illustrate philosophical ideas, but to substantively contribute to the philosophical conversation
Trigger warning 1: this course will explore heavy and sometimes controversial themes, touching on religion, politics, and morality. Students who are uninterested in engaging with these themes are advised to avoid the course.
Trigger warning 2: this course will require students to watch films that may include intense and disturbing imagery and violence, as well as occasional, brief nudity/sexual content. Students who are uncomfortable with such content should discuss their concerns at the beginning of the course so that we can work out alternate viewing assignments.
AI policy: AI usage in completing course assignments is considered cheating. Students who use AI to complete course assignments will fail the assignment and will be referred to the Honor Council. Repeated violations will result in failure of the course. This includes use of tools like Quillette, Grammarly, and other services that will rewrite your work.
Student Learning Outcomes
- Define key philosophical concepts and film techniques used to convey philosophical arguments
- Explain how films can function as philosophical thought experiments and arguments
- Apply philosophical frameworks to analyze the content and form of films
- Use film analysis techniques to identify how cinematic elements convey philosophical ideas
- Compare different philosophical perspectives on issues like consciousness, ethics, and artificial intelligence as presented in films
- Analyze how specific films challenge or support philosophical arguments from assigned readings
- Develop original philosophical arguments using evidence from both films and texts
- Construct written analyses that integrate film theory, philosophical concepts, and personal interpretation
- Evaluate the effectiveness of film as a medium for philosophical inquiry and argument
Important Dates
Visit the Academic Calendar (tamiu.edu) page to view the term's important dates.
Textbooks
Group | Title | Author | ISBN |
---|---|---|---|
Required | Thinking on Screen | Thomas Wartenberg | 0-203-03062-1 |
Other Course Materials
To go to the bookstore, click here.
Films will be available through Kanopy and Swank Digital Campus. These can be found at the "Digital Resources" page of our university library site:
https://tamiu.libguides.com/az.php?t=36869
Grading Criteria
CLASS ASSIGNMENTS:
I. Philosophical Film Analysis: Note-taking exercise
Students will complete a minimum of three structured note-taking exercises on the seven films they watch outside of class. You will have seven opportunities to submit these exercises; you only need to submit three to fulfill the requirements for this exercise. In order to count, an exercise must be submitted by the due date listed in the syllabus. A skeletal outline of the note structure will be provided, in which students will be prompted to complete a pre-viewing preparation (involving, for example, listing key philosophical insights and concepts from the assigned reading). During the viewing, students will take notes on the philosophical ideas conveyed in key scenes, and relate how scenes from the film either illustrate or challenge key concepts from the reading. Students will also be asked to track the philosophical perspectives of characters and identify specific cinematic techniques that communicate relevant ideas.
After viewing the film, students will be prompted to synthesize their understanding of how the film engages with philosophy, critically think about the arguments presented in the readings/film, and extend the analysis, comparing the film’s treatment of philosophical themes to other films appearing in the course as well as formulating new questions and arguments of your own.
The goal of the exercise will be to actively engage with both the film and the philosophical texts, drawing connections and identifying areas of agreement, tension, or novel interpretation. You may find the note-taking exercise frameworks on our blackboard site.
II. In-class papers
There will be two in-class papers that students will complete. In the papers, students will be asked to apply philosophical techniques to the analysis of specific problems raised in film.
III. Participation
Excellent participation consists in participating in all polls and in-class exercises and by making an average of at least one contribution (questions, comments, etc.) to class discussion every class session starting on the second class date. You do not need to show mastery of the material in class; our live class sessions are opportunities for students to review, clarify, and make mistakes, all in service of learning. You should not, therefore, feel concerned if your contributions sometimes or even frequently contain errors, as the correction of error is sometimes more helpful to learning than the proclamation of truth.
I understand that different forms of participation may be easier for different students. Some may have difficulty voicing their questions in the live sessions. For this reason, I have made it possible for students to comment on the class materials in a discussion forum on Blackboard designed for that purpose. To receive credit, any comments should be posted 6 hours before the start of the class session (this is to give me time to incorporate the question into the day’s lesson plan). If a question or comment is likely to foster general learning, I will bring it up during the class session for general discussion. Posting such a question will fully satisfy the participation expectations for the class session.
When you post a question in the discussion forum, provide a specific reference to a passage from one of the readings or a portion of one of the videos — with specific page numbers or timestamps. Example templates for good questions/comments (i.e., questions that I will likely incorporate in class discussion) include:
1. clarificatory questions, e.g., “[Author] repeatedly uses [important term or concept] on pages 162-175 of [reading], but I’m not sure what she means by it. It seems to mean [your hypothesis] but I’m not sure because [reasons]. Could you clarify?”
2. connecting questions, e.g., “How would [idea or argument] that [philosopher] bring up at 20:53 of [video title] apply or connect to [another idea, argument, situation, or process]?”
3. challenging questions, e.g., “It seems that the argument that [author] makes on page 6 of [reading] is invalid because [reasons], or it is valid but unsound because it relies upon a premise that is doubtful or false, because [explanation]. How would [author] respond to this challenge?”
4. contributory comments, e.g. “When [philosopher] talked about [idea, event, argument] at 15:12 of [video] it reminded me of [another idea, event, argument]. This is relevant and worthy of discussion because [reasons].”
Because there will be some integration of technology into the course through Tophat and argumentation.io, it is recommended that students bring their laptop to class with them. Any technology in class is to be used only for learning purposes.
IV. Final paper
Students will be asked to submit a (suggested) 6-8 page final paper at the conclusion of the course in which they take one philosophical theme and explore how several different films explore that theme. This paper can draw on the note-taking exercises, in-class papers, and feedback that I have provided to them, and should build on feedback to create a more sophisticated philosophical analysis. For more information, see the “final paper instructions” on blackboard.
ONE MINUTE PAPER:
After every live class session you will write a so-called “one-minute paper,” in which you will write no more than two- or three-sentence answers to two questions: (a) What was the most important point covered in today’s class/readings? (b) What issue or question was left most unclear in your mind at the end of today’s class/readings (or, if nothing was unclear, what do you think was most unclear for your fellow students)? You must submit these immediately after the live class session is concluded. I will not be grading these based on content
GRADES:
DISCUSSION/IN-CLASS/1MIN PAPER 40%
FILM ANALYSES 15%
IN CLASS PAPERS 15%
FINAL PAPER 30%
The instructor will grade holistically. This means that a student’s total progress in the course is analyzed when final grades are assessed. Therefore, doing badly on one assignment does not guarantee a low grade for the course, nor does doing excellent on one assignment guarantee a high grade for the course.
Late Papers: Regardless of the assignment, deadlines are deadlines. If there are extreme circumstances—or a sudden, serious situation—that prevents a student from meeting deadlines, the student should communicate with the instructor so that a solution to the problem can be found. A student may request an extension by communicating with the instructor, in person or via e-mail, AT LEAST 48 hours in advance, but the granting of an extension is dependent upon the circumstances. If a student submits their assignment late (without an excuse), the final grade they will receive on the assignment will normally be reduced by percentage points according to the following scale:
- Submitted less than 12 hours after due date: 1 percentage point grade reduction
- Submitted between 12 and 24 hours after due date: 5 percentage point grade reduction
- Submitted between 1 and 2 days after due date: 10 percentage point grade reduction
- Submitted between 2 and 3 days after due date: 20 percentage point grade reduction
- Submitted between 3 and 4 days after due date: 35 percentage point grade reduction
- Submitted 4 or more days late: not accepted under normal circumstances
Thus, if a student has a paper that would ordinarily receive a 95/100, they will receive a 94/100 if submitted less than 12 hours late, a 90 if submitted 15 hours late, an 85 if submitted a full 24 hours late, and a 75 if submitted 2 days late. Materials submitted more than 4 days late will not, under normal circumstances, be accepted without prior excuse. As you can see, the penalty for a few hour’s lateness is so small as to make very little difference for your grade, so if the choice is between writing a poor paper and submitting by midnight vs. writing a decent paper and submitting in the morning, the latter is advised.
EXCEPTION TO THE ABOVE RULE: all class assignments MUST be submitted at least 12 hours prior to the registrar grade submission due date to receive credit
Students can expect me to be as prompt as humanly possible in grading and returning submitted material (what is humanly possible depends upon the number of students I am teaching). I encourage students to demand of me the same respect, fairness, and openness in class as I expect of them. If a student feels I have graded their assignment too harshly, they should feel free to email me or speak to me in office hours for clarification. I am happy to adjust a grade up (or down) if a student can provide a compelling argument for this adjustment or point out something I missed in my initial grading.
Excellent participation consists in participating in all classes, both orally and via tophat. Determining the "quality" of a contribution to class discussion is, to some degree, an inherently subjective judgment that will be made by the instructor. In general, if your participation shows familiarity with and good understanding of the readings and leads to on-topic discussion, it will be judged high quality. A rough rubric showing what I look for in participation can be found in the rubrics folder, entitled “Rubric for Excellent In-class Participation.”
GRADE | PERCENTAGE |
A | 91-100 |
B | 80-90.9 |
C | 70-79.9 |
D | 60-69.9 |
F | Below 60 |
Open Boilerplate
All students are required to do the assigned reading. You might find it valuable to return to it after class discussion. This class will involve close examination of dense and often difficult concepts and arguments, and it is sometimes only on a second or even third reading that the texts yield insight. I generally do not expect to fully understand a philosophical text until at least my second reading.
This course also requires viewing of several films. Note: you should do the reading/viewing for the day PRIOR to watching the films. Every film assigned will also require you to complete a note-taking assignment which will guide you in relating themes of the film to the philosophical texts we are reading, and will prompt you to engage in your own philosophical analysis of the films.
Note on mental fatigue: sometimes, when reading, you may find that you can no longer process what you are engaging with. This could be a sign that you are mentally exhausted. The best approach is to put the reading down and come back to it later. After a break, a snack, or maybe a nap, you are likely to find the reading much easier to process.
Course Policies and Expectations: In the Classroom
It is important that every student to come to every class session. This is a discussion-based class, and the material covered will be very difficult to master without the assistance of the instructor and the community of the class. Students will lose 1/2 of their final participation grade for each additional unexcused absence (e.g., their “B” would become an “B-”).
I expect all students to be respectful of their fellow students. Heated debate is not a bad thing in a philosophy class, but personal attacks or browbeating your argumentative opponents reflects poorly on you and your philosophical position.
Schedule of Topics and Assignments
Day | Date | Agenda/Topic | Reading(s) | Due |
---|---|---|---|---|
Mon | 1/6 | Course Introduction Overview: how to analyze film |
Wartenberg, Chapter 1 "How to Watch a Movie" by Sharman (link on Blackboard) Recommended: "Cinematography" and "Editing" by Sharman (links on Blackboard) |
|
Tue | 1/7 | Can film be philosophy? | Wartenberg, Chapters 2-3 Selections from Plato (on Blackboard) Selections from Aristotle (on Blackboard) |
|
Wed | 1/8 | Skepticism and epistemic thought experiment | The Matrix (available on Swank digital) Wartenberg, Chapter 4 Selections from Descartes (on Blackboard) Recommended: Rashomon (available on Kanopy) |
Philosophical Film Analysis I |
Thu | 1/9 | Film as ethical thought experiment | Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind (2004) Available on Swank Digital Wartenberg Chapter 5 Recommended: Watch Silence (2016) on Swank Digital |
Submit on Blackboard: Philosophical Film Analysis II In-class short paper I |
Fri | 1/10 | Existentialist film | The Double Life of Veronique (1991) Kanopy Read: “The Double Life of Véronique: The Forced Choice of Freedom” by Slavoj Zizek (link on Blackboard) Read: "Toward a Phenomenology of Having" by Gabriel Marcel (on Blackboard) Recommended: Seconds (1966) on Swank Digital Campus |
Submit on Blackboard: Philosophical Film Analysis III |
Mon | 1/13 | Moral Phronesis | Watch: Gran Torino (Swank) Read: Wartenberg Chapter 6 |
Submit film analysis IV |
Tue | 1/14 | Artificial Intelligence and the Human Spirit | Recommended: Watch The Third Man (Kanopy) Watch: Ex Machina (2014) (Kanopy) Read: Karofsky and Litch, Chapter 5 (Blackboard) Read: John Searle, excerpts (Blackboard) Recommended: Watch Her (2009) (Swank) |
Submit on Blackboard: film analysis V |
Wed | 1/15 | Phenomenological insights from film | Stalker (1979) (Kanopy) Wartenberg, Chapter 7 Recommended: Nostalghia (1983) (Kanopy) |
Submit: Film Analysis VI |
Thu | 1/16 | Documentary and Philosophy | Watch: Grizzly Man (2005) (Swank) Read: selections from Rousseau (Blackboard) Read: Selections from "The Eye of the Crocodile" by Val Plumwood Recommended: Watch Encounters at the End of the World (2007) (Youtube link on Blackboard) |
Submit: Film Analysis VII |
Fri | 1/17 | Wrapping up | Read: Wartenberg Chapter 7 Watch: TBD |
Submit Final Paper on Blackboard (due by noon on Friday) |
University/College Policies
Please see the University Policies below.
COVID-19 Related Policies
If you have tested positive for COVID-19, please refer to the Student Handbook, Appendix A (Attendance Rule) for instructions.
Required Class Attendance
Students are expected to attend every class in person (or virtually, if the class is online) and to complete all assignments. If you cannot attend class, it is your responsibility to communicate absences with your professors. The faculty member will decide if your excuse is valid and thus may provide lecture materials of the class. According to University policy, acceptable reasons for an absence, which cannot affect a student’s grade, include:
- Participation in an authorized University activity.
- Death or major illness in a student’s immediate family.
- Illness of a dependent family member.
- Participation in legal proceedings or administrative procedures that require a student’s presence.
- Religious holy day.
- Illness that is too severe or contagious for the student to attend class.
- Required participation in military duties.
- Mandatory admission interviews for professional or graduate school which cannot be rescheduled.
Students are responsible for providing satisfactory evidence to faculty members within seven calendar days of their absence and return to class. They must substantiate the reason for the absence. If the absence is excused, faculty members must either provide students with the opportunity to make up the exam or other work missed, or provide a satisfactory alternative to complete the exam or other work missed within 30 calendar days from the date of absence. Students who miss class due to a University-sponsored activity are responsible for identifying their absences to their instructors with as much advance notice as possible.
Classroom Behavior (applies to online or Face-to-Face Classes)
TAMIU encourages classroom discussion and academic debate as an essential intellectual activity. It is essential that students learn to express and defend their beliefs, but it is also essential that they learn to listen and respond respectfully to others whose beliefs they may not share. The University will always tolerate different, unorthodox, and unpopular points of view, but it will not tolerate condescending or insulting remarks. When students verbally abuse or ridicule and intimidate others whose views they do not agree with, they subvert the free exchange of ideas that should characterize a university classroom. If their actions are deemed by the professor to be disruptive, they will be subject to appropriate disciplinary action (please refer to Student Handbook Article 4).
TAMIU Honor Code: Plagiarism and Cheating
As a TAMIU student, you are bound by the TAMIU Honor Code to conduct yourself ethically in all your activities as a TAMIU student and to report violations of the Honor Code. Please read carefully the Student Handbook Article 7 and Article 10 available at https://www.tamiu.edu/scce/studenthandbook.shtml.
We are committed to strict enforcement of the Honor Code. Violations of the Honor Code tend to involve claiming work that is not one’s own, most commonly plagiarism in written assignments and any form of cheating on exams and other types of assignments.
Plagiarism is the presentation of someone else’s work as your own. It occurs when you:
- Borrow someone else’s facts, ideas, or opinions and put them entirely in your own words. You must acknowledge that these thoughts are not your own by immediately citing the source in your paper. Failure to do this is plagiarism.
- Borrow someone else’s words (short phrases, clauses, or sentences), you must enclose the copied words in quotation marks as well as citing the source. Failure to do this is plagiarism.
- Present someone else’s paper or exam (stolen, borrowed, or bought) as your own. You have committed a clearly intentional form of intellectual theft and have put your academic future in jeopardy. This is the worst form of plagiarism.
Here is another explanation from the 2020, seventh edition of the Manual of The American Psychological Association (APA):
“Plagiarism is the act of presenting the words, idea, or images of another as your own; it denies authors or creators of content the credit they are due. Whether deliberate or unintentional, plagiarism violates ethical standards in scholarship” (p. 254). This same principle applies to the illicit use of AI.
Plagiarism: Researchers do not claim the words and ideas of another as their own; they give credit where credit is due. Quotations marks should be used to indicate the exact words of another. Each time you paraphrase another author (i.e., summarize a passage or rearrange the order of a sentence and change some of the words), you need to credit the source in the text. The key element of this principle is that authors do not present the work of another as if it were their own words. This can extend to ideas as well as written words. If authors model a study after one done by someone else, the originating author should be given credit. If the rationale for a study was suggested in the discussion section of someone else's article, the person should be given credit. Given the free exchange of ideas, which is very important for the health of intellectual discourse, authors may not know where an idea for a study originated. If authors do know, however, they should acknowledge the source; this includes personal communications (p. 11). For guidance on proper documentation, consult the Academic Success Center or a recommended guide to documentation and research such as the Manual of the APA or the MLA Handbook for Writers of Research Papers. If you still have doubts concerning proper documentation, seek advice from your instructor prior to submitting a final draft.
TAMIU has penalties for plagiarism and cheating.
- Penalties for Plagiarism: Should a faculty member discover that a student has committed plagiarism, the student should receive a grade of 'F' in that course and the matter will be referred to the Honor Council for possible disciplinary action. The faculty member, however, may elect to give freshmen and sophomore students a “zero” for the assignment and to allow them to revise the assignment up to a grade of “F” (50%) if they believe that the student plagiarized out of ignorance or carelessness and not out of an attempt to deceive in order to earn an unmerited grade; the instructor must still report the offense to the Honor Council. This option should not be available to juniors, seniors, or graduate students, who cannot reasonably claim ignorance of documentation rules as an excuse. For repeat offenders in undergraduate courses or for an offender in any graduate course, the penalty for plagiarism is likely to include suspension or expulsion from the university.
- Caution: Be very careful what you upload to Turnitin or send to your professor for evaluation. Whatever you upload for evaluation will be considered your final, approved draft. If it is plagiarized, you will be held responsible. The excuse that “it was only a draft” will not be accepted.
- Caution: Also, do not share your electronic files with others. If you do, you are responsible for the possible consequences. If another student takes your file of a paper and changes the name to his or her name and submits it and you also submit the paper, we will hold both of you responsible for plagiarism. It is impossible for us to know with certainty who wrote the paper and who stole it. And, of course, we cannot know if there was collusion between you and the other student in the matter.
- Penalties for Cheating: Should a faculty member discover a student cheating on an exam or quiz or other class project, the student should receive a “zero” for the assignment and not be allowed to make the assignment up. The incident should be reported to the chair of the department and to the Honor Council. If the cheating is extensive, however, or if the assignment constitutes a major grade for the course (e.g., a final exam), or if the student has cheated in the past, the student should receive an “F” in the course, and the matter should be referred to the Honor Council. Additional penalties, including suspension or expulsion from the university may be imposed. Under no circumstances should a student who deserves an “F” in the course be allowed to withdraw from the course with a “W.”
- Caution: Chat groups that start off as “study groups” can easily devolve into “cheating groups.” Be very careful not to join or remain any chat group if it begins to discuss specific information about exams or assignments that are meant to require individual work. If you are a member of such a group and it begins to cheat, you will be held responsible along with all the other members of the group. The TAMIU Honor Code requires that you report any such instances of cheating.
- Student Right of Appeal: Faculty will notify students immediately via the student’s TAMIU e- mail account that they have submitted plagiarized work. Students have the right to appeal a faculty member’s charge of academic dishonesty by notifying the TAMIU Honor Council of their intent to appeal as long as the notification of appeal comes within 10 business days of the faculty member’s e-mail message to the student and/or the Office of Student Conduct and Community Engagement. The Student Handbook provides more details.
Use of Work in Two or More Courses
You may not submit work completed in one course for a grade in a second course unless you receive explicit permission to do so by the instructor of the second course. In general, you should get credit for a work product only once.
AI Policies
Your instructor will provide you with their personal policy on the use of AI in the classroom setting and associated coursework.
TAMIU E-Mail and SafeZone
Personal Announcements sent to students through TAMIU E-mail (tamiu.edu or dusty email) are the official means of communicating course and university business with students and faculty –not the U.S. Mail and no other e-mail addresses. Students and faculty must check their TAMIU e-mail accounts regularly, if not daily. Not having seen an important TAMIU e-mail or message from a faculty member, chair, or dean is not accepted as an excuse for failure to take important action.
Students, faculty, and staff are encouraged to download the SafeZone app, which is a free mobile app for all University faculty, staff, and students. SafeZone allows you to: report safety concerns (24/7), get connected with mental health professionals, activate location sharing with authorities, and anonymously report incidents. Go to https://www.tamiu.edu/adminis/police/safezone/index.shtml for more information.
Copyright Restrictions
The Copyright Act of 1976 grants to copyright owners the exclusive right to reproduce their works and distribute copies of their work. Works that receive copyright protection include published works such as a textbook. Copying a textbook without permission from the owner of the copyright may constitute copyright infringement. Civil and criminal penalties may be assessed for copyright infringement. Civil penalties include damages up to $100,000; criminal penalties include a fine up to $250,000 and imprisonment. Copyright laws do not allow students and professors to make photocopies of copyrighted materials, but you may copy a limited portion of a work, such as article from a journal or a chapter from a book for your own personal academic use or, in the case of a professor, for personal, limited classroom use. In general, the extent of your copying should not suggest that the purpose or the effect of your copying is to avoid paying for the materials. And, of course, you may not sell these copies for a profit. Thus, students who copy textbooks to avoid buying them or professors who provide photocopies of textbooks to enable students to save money are violating the law.
Students with Disabilities
Texas A&M International University seeks to provide reasonable accommodations for all qualified persons with disabilities. This University will adhere to all applicable federal, state, and local laws, regulations and guidelines with respect to providing reasonable accommodations as required to afford equal education opportunity. It is the student's responsibility to register with the Office of Student Counseling and Disability Services located in Student Center 126. This office will contact the faculty member to recommend specific, reasonable accommodations. Faculty are prohibited from making accommodations based solely on communications from students. They may make accommodations only when provided documentation by the Student Counseling and Disability Services office.
Student Attendance and Leave of Absence (LOA) Policy
As part of our efforts to assist and encourage all students towards graduation, TAMIU provides
LOA’s for students, including pregnant/parenting students, in accordance with the Attendance Rule (Section 3.07) and the Student LOA Rule (Section 3.08), which includes the “Leave of Absence Request” form. Both rules can be found in the TAMIU Student Handbook (URL: http://www.tamiu.edu/studentaffairs/StudentHandbook1.shtml).
Pregnant and Parenting Students
Under Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972, harassment based on sex, including harassment because of pregnancy or related conditions, is prohibited. A pregnant/parenting student must be granted an absence for as long as the student’s physician deems the absence medically necessary. It is a violation of Title IX to ask for documentation relative to the pregnant/parenting student’s status beyond what would be required for other medical conditions. If a student would like to file a complaint for discrimination due to his or her pregnant/parenting status, please contact the TAMIU Title IX Coordinator (Lorissa M. Cortez, 5201 University Boulevard, KLM 159B, Laredo, TX 78041,TitleIX@tamiu.edu, 956.326.2857) and/or the Office of Civil Rights (Dallas Office, U.S. Department of Education, 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 1620, Dallas, TX 75201-6810, 214.661.9600). You can also report it on TAMIU’s anonymous electronic reporting site: https://www.tamiu.edu/reportit.
TAMIU advises a pregnant/parenting student to notify their professor once the student is aware that accommodations for such will be necessary. It is recommended that the student and professor develop a reasonable plan for the student’s completion of missed coursework or assignments. The Office of Equal Opportunity and Diversity (Lorissa M. Cortez, lorissam.cortez@tamiu.edu) can assist the student and professor in working out the reasonable accommodations. For other questions or concerns regarding Title IX compliance related to pregnant/parenting students at the University, contact the Title IX Coordinator. In the event that a student will need a leave of absence for a substantial period of time, TAMIU urges the student to consider a Leave of Absence (LOA) as outlined in the TAMIU Student Handbook. As part of our efforts to assist and encourage all students towards graduation, TAMIU provides LOA’s for students, including pregnant/parenting students, in accordance with the Attendance Rule and the Student LOA Rule. Both rules can be found in the TAMIU Student Handbook (https://www.tamiu.edu/scce/studenthandbook.shtml).
Anti-Discrimination/Title IX
TAMIU does not discriminate or permit harassment against any individual on the basis of race, color, sex, religion, national origin, age, disability, genetic information, veteran status, sexual orientation or gender identity in admissions, educational programs, or employment. If you would like to file a complaint relative to Title IX or any civil rights violation, please contact the TAMIU Director of Equal Opportunity and Diversity/Title IX Coordinator, Lorissa M. Cortez, 5201 University Boulevard, Killam Library 159B, Laredo, TX 78041,TitleIX@tamiu.edu, 956.326.2857, via the anonymous electronic reporting website, ReportIt, at https://www.tamiu.edu/reportit, and/or the Office of Civil Rights (Dallas Office), U.S. Department of Education, 1999 Bryan Street, Suite 1620, Dallas, TX 75201-6810, 214.661.9600.
Incompletes
Students who are unable to complete a course should withdraw from the course before the final date for withdrawal and receive a “W.” To qualify for an “incomplete” and thus have the opportunity to complete the course at a later date, a student must meet the following criteria:
- The student must have completed 90% of the course work assigned before the final date for withdrawing from a course with a “W”, and the student must be passing the course;
- The student cannot complete the course because an accident, an illness, or a traumatic personal or family event occurred after the final date for withdrawal from a course;
- The student must sign an “Incomplete Grade Contract” and secure signatures of approval from the professor and the college dean.
- The student must agree to complete the missing course work before the end of the next long semester; failure to meet this deadline will cause the “I” to automatically be converted to an “F”; extensions to this deadline may be granted by the dean of the college. This is the general policy regarding the circumstances under which an “incomplete” may be granted, but under exceptional circumstances, a student may receive an incomplete who does not meet all of the criteria above if the faculty member, department chair, and dean recommend it.
WIN Contracts
The Department of Biology and Chemistry does not permit WIN contracts. For other departments within the college, WIN Contracts are offered only under exceptional circumstances and are limited to graduating seniors. Only courses offered by full-time TAMIU faculty or TAMIU instructors are eligible to be contracted for the WIN requirement. However, a WIN contract for a course taught by an adjunct may be approved, with special permission from the department chair and dean. Students must seek approval before beginning any work for the WIN Contract. No student will contract more than one course per semester. Summer WIN Contracts must continue through both summer sessions.
Student Responsibility for Dropping a Course
It is the responsibility of the student to drop the course before the final date for withdrawal from a course. Faculty members, in fact, may not drop a student from a course without getting the approval of their department chair and dean.
Independent Study Course
Independent Study (IS) courses are offered only under exceptional circumstances. Required courses intended to build academic skills may not be taken as IS (e.g., clinical supervision and internships). No student will take more than one IS course per semester. Moreover, IS courses are limited to seniors and graduate students. Summer IS course must continue through both summer sessions.
Grade Changes & Appeals
Faculty are authorized to change final grades only when they have committed a computational error or an error in recording a grade, and they must receive the approval of their department chairs and the dean to change the grade. As part of that approval, they must attach a detailed explanation of the reason for the mistake. Only in rare cases would another reason be entertained as legitimate for a grade change. A student who is unhappy with his or her grade on an assignment must discuss the situation with the faculty member teaching the course. If students believe that they have been graded unfairly, they have the right to appeal the grade using a grade appeal process in the Student Handbook and in the Faculty Handbook.
Final Examination
All courses in all colleges must include a comprehensive exam or performance and be given on the date and time specified by the Academic Calendar and the Final Exam schedule published by the Registrar’s Office. In the College of Arts & Sciences all final exams must contain a written component. The written component should comprise at least 20% of the final exam grade. Exceptions to this policy must receive the approval of the department chair and the dean at the beginning of the semester.
Mental Health and Well-Being
The university aims to provide students with essential knowledge and tools to understand and support mental health. As part of our commitment to your well-being, we offer access to Telus Health, a service available 24/7/365 via chat, phone, or webinar. Scan the QR code to download the app and explore the resources available to you for guidance and support whenever you need it. The Telus app is available to download directly from TELUS (tamiu.edu) or from the Apple App Store and Google Play.